Re: Issue 500 is closed (was: [xop10] broken references section)

On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

> * Yves Lafon wrote:
>>>  <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-xop10-20040826/>, [MTOM] and [SOAP
>>> Representation Header] refer to their documents as Working Drafts but
>>> point at the URI of the CR. Appendix B would benefit from following some
>>> of the guidelines for references sections, see
>
>> Please check the latest editors copies [3][4][5] and please tell the group
>> if this satisfies your concerns.
>
> It does, thanks,
>
>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/06/Attachments/XOP.html#references
>> [4] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/06/Attachments/OptimizationMechanism.html#references
>> [5] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/06/Attachments/Representation.html#references
>
> but in [3] the Informative References section should also be updated
> (adding hyperlinks). I did not check all the references but it seems
> fine to me.

I am fixing [3] right now. Thak you for noticing this.

>
> Hmm, the documents appear to be inconsistent with the guidelines spelled
> out in Appendix C of the XHTML 1.0 Second Edition Recommendation, they
> use
>
>  <x lang="...">
>
> instead of
>
>  <x lang="..." xml:lang="...">
>
> and
>
>  <a ... />
>
> instead of
>
>  <a ...></a>
>
> specifically the latter is a problem for a number of user agents and
> should be fixed before publication; you can use the Experimental XHTML
> 1.0 Appendix C Validator at
>
>  http://qa-dev.w3.org/~bjoern/appendix-c/validator/
>
> to find these problems. I did not check whether this also applies to the
> published documents.

The use of <a /> and xml:lang is a spec prod issue,
Can you direct this comment to spec-prod@w3.org?
Thanks,

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."