- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:22:09 +0200
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
* Yves Lafon wrote: >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-xop10-20040826/>, [MTOM] and [SOAP >> Representation Header] refer to their documents as Working Drafts but >> point at the URI of the CR. Appendix B would benefit from following some >> of the guidelines for references sections, see >Please check the latest editors copies [3][4][5] and please tell the group >if this satisfies your concerns. It does, thanks, >[3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/06/Attachments/XOP.html#references >[4] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/06/Attachments/OptimizationMechanism.html#references >[5] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/06/Attachments/Representation.html#references but in [3] the Informative References section should also be updated (adding hyperlinks). I did not check all the references but it seems fine to me. Hmm, the documents appear to be inconsistent with the guidelines spelled out in Appendix C of the XHTML 1.0 Second Edition Recommendation, they use <x lang="..."> instead of <x lang="..." xml:lang="..."> and <a ... /> instead of <a ...></a> specifically the latter is a problem for a number of user agents and should be fixed before publication; you can use the Experimental XHTML 1.0 Appendix C Validator at http://qa-dev.w3.org/~bjoern/appendix-c/validator/ to find these problems. I did not check whether this also applies to the published documents. Thanks!
Received on Friday, 24 September 2004 14:22:55 UTC