W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > April 2004

Re: Issue 447 Closed

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:09:13 -0400
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF23C23ADA.416F0217-ON85256E83.006E8BD0@lotus.com>

I am completely satisfied with this resolution, thank you. 

I would note that the term "outer package" is perhaps misleading, as I 
believe the package in question is outer for XOP but inner to the 
multipart/related in the case of MTOM.  I presume this is only a matter of 
the wording of your email, in which case no further followup is necessary. 
 In any case, I am as noted above completely satisfied with what I take to 
be the intent of the resolution.  Thank you!

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








"Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
04/27/2004 08:56 AM

 
        To:     <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Issue 447 Closed


Noah,

You raised an issue, give the number 447[1] with respect to how an
MTOM/XOP aware SOAP node will make the determination as to whether or
not to perform MTOM/XOP processing. The XMLP working group have decided
that such processing will be triggered by the media type of the outer
package, which in the MTOM case will be application/soap_xop+xml

I trust this resolves the issue to your satisfaction,

Regards

Martin Gudgin
For the W3C XMLP Working Group

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x447
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2004 16:39:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:28 GMT