RE: Issue 447 Closed

Noah,

Yes, you are completely correct re. 'Outer packaging'

Sorry for the confusion

Gudge

> -----Original Message-----
> From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: 27 April 2004 21:09
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Issue 447 Closed
> 
> I am completely satisfied with this resolution, thank you. 
> 
> I would note that the term "outer package" is perhaps 
> misleading, as I 
> believe the package in question is outer for XOP but inner to the 
> multipart/related in the case of MTOM.  I presume this is 
> only a matter of 
> the wording of your email, in which case no further followup 
> is necessary. 
>  In any case, I am as noted above completely satisfied with 
> what I take to 
> be the intent of the resolution.  Thank you!
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn 
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
> 04/27/2004 08:56 AM
> 
>  
>         To:     <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
>         cc: 
>         Subject:        Issue 447 Closed
> 
> 
> Noah,
> 
> You raised an issue, give the number 447[1] with respect to how an
> MTOM/XOP aware SOAP node will make the determination as to whether or
> not to perform MTOM/XOP processing. The XMLP working group 
> have decided
> that such processing will be triggered by the media type of the outer
> package, which in the MTOM case will be application/soap_xop+xml
> 
> I trust this resolves the issue to your satisfaction,
> 
> Regards
> 
> Martin Gudgin
> For the W3C XMLP Working Group
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x447
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2004 16:38:33 UTC