W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > December 2003

Possible new issue: Miffy content in Miffy content

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:50:09 -0500
To: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF2CF2B346.A447049F-ON85256DF0.0062469E@lotus.com>

When the scope of MTOM was SOAP-only, it seemed that the likely rule would

      Don't use xbinc:include in the SOAP envelope, it's for use by

Now that we are considering miffy, there are questions about including one
miffy-based format in another.  Here's a concrete if somewhat contrived

a) imagine a vcard-like XML format that allows inclusion of someone's
picture.  Enable that for miffy so that the picture can be carried
b) Question:  can you carry such a vcard as part of the content of a soap
body or header?  What are the miffy processing rules of that SOAP envelope
is itself Miffy encoded?

This seems to be an example of a more general issue, relating to the
combination of miffy-enabled formats.  Of course, this is all somewhat
complicated by the somewhat strange relationship of the
application/soap_mtom_xml media type to the surrounding multipart/related.

Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2003 12:57:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:00 UTC