W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > April 2003

Re: soap 1.2 testing and empty role uri

From: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 21:59:04 -0800
To: "Bob Cunnings" <cunnings@whitemesa.com>, xmlp-comments@w3.org
Cc: akarmark@oracle.com, carine@w3.org, ylafon@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF31F706D9.9E4F8DBA-ON88256CFB.00204247-88256CFB.0020DFDE@us.ibm.com>

Bob, the most recent version of the TC doc also appears to have the same
text, see T9 etc in
http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-testcollection.html. I will
bring this up to the WG this week, and depending upon their resolution (I
assume it will be what was concluded in the recent dist-app email thread,
i.e. role="" has the value of the base) then I will propose that the WG (a)
inserts clarifying text into the Primer and (b) T9-T14 are suitably
amended. Thanks for spotting this.

I've cc'ed all potentially affected parties - pls remove xmlp-comments from
any replies to this message.

David C. Fallside, IBM
Ext Ph: 530.477.7169
Int  Ph: 544.9665

|         |           "Bob Cunnings"   |
|         |           <cunnings@whiteme|
|         |           sa.com>          |
|         |                            |
|         |           03/31/2003 06:11 |
|         |           PM               |
  |                                                                                                                             |
  |       To:       David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS                                                                       |
  |       cc:                                                                                                                   |
  |       Subject:  soap 1.2 testing and empty role uri                                                                         |


I looked back at my notes and found the reason for my misplaced belief that
the empty role URI mapped to the ultimate receiver... it's Tests T9 through
T14 in the SOAP 1.2 Test Collection:


which test this case and make the same (false) assumption. I had
these for testing purposes [1] and will for now consider them suspect.

Should this be raised as an issue somewhere?


[1] http://www.whitemesa.net/test-soap12/soap12-test-index.htm#testcoll
Received on Tuesday, 1 April 2003 01:07:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:59 UTC