- From: Amelia A. Lewis <alewis@tibco.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 14:23:40 -0500
- To: xmlp-comments@w3.org
I realize that this is after last call, but I want to submit this anyway. Throughout the document, the definition is that a compound message consists of a primary SOAP message part and zero or more secondary parts. This is silly. If it has zero secondary parts, it isn't a compound message. Throughout, "zero or more secondary parts" should read "one or more secondary parts." Unless the attachment feature is redefining the meaning of SOAP without attachments. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.com
Received on Monday, 11 November 2002 14:23:55 UTC