W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > November 2002

RE: LC Issue 250: closed, editorial: text changed

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 17:33:22 -0800
Message-ID: <68B95AA1648D1840AB0083CC63E57AD6096E7E8B@red-msg-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <reagle@w3.org>
Cc: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>


In order to get closure on issue 250 [0] (see [1] for thread), the SOAP
1.2 editors have editorially restructured and clarified the part
containing the SOAP 1.2 specific role definitions and introduced a table
that makes it easier to determine how they are defined. You can see the
table at [2] as part of section 2.2 [3]. Thank you for your input.

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

[0] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x250
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Sep/0207.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part1.xml#soaproles

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org] 
>Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 14:05
>To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
>Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
>Subject: Re: LC Issue 250: closed, editorial: text changed
>On Thursday 26 September 2002 04:23 pm, 
>noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
>> OK.  I guess I like to be particularly careful in a situation where 
>> the wording has been such a problem and where, in this case 
>an outside 
>> respondent, has proposed a specific format as a resolution 
>to an issue
>> that wouldn't close.   We're agreeing:  it's only a question of how
>> careful we want to be to avoid misunderstandings.  Thanks.
>BTW: I'm not advocating for a short name, nor that particular 
>format; I was 
>just using that as a way in which the identifier, the 
>and conformance requirements are more explicit. (In the XKMS spec I'm 
>trying to ensure all identifiers have a meaning, and every 
>has some subject and (testable) requirement:
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2002Sep/0024.html
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2002 20:33:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:59 UTC