W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Closing issue 204: Cache control directives

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 12:11:37 -0700
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D075D7146@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>

Updated subject

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen 
>Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:06
>To: 'Mark Nottingham'
>Cc: 'xmlp-comments@w3.org'
>Subject: Closing issue 204: SOAPAction header and "action" 
>parameter on media type
>
>
>
>Mark,
>
>The XML Protocol WG [2] has decided to close issue 204 [0], 
>which you raised against the SOAP 1.2 specification. If the 
>resolution outlined below is not acceptable to you then please 
>respond to this mail with a detailed description of your 
>concerns and preferably what you see not being addressed as 
>part of the resolution.
>
>RESOLUTION
>----------
>
>In [1] you ask whether the WG has considered the various 
>cache-control directives and in particular "no-transform" and 
>how that applies to SOAP. The WG discussed the issue and came 
>to the following conclusion: Any HTTP implementation should 
>certainly take advantage of the features provided by HTTP [3]. 
>However, there is nothing particularly special about how the 
>various cache-control directives apply to SOAP - they are 
>defined in an entirely orthogonal manner and so the WG didn't 
>see a reason for why the binding should say.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
>mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
>
>[0] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues#x204
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Apr/0173.html
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/
>[3] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt
>
Received on Wednesday, 1 May 2002 15:40:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:27 GMT