Mark, The XML Protocol WG [2] has decided to close issue 204 [0], which you raised against the SOAP 1.2 specification. If the resolution outlined below is not acceptable to you then please respond to this mail with a detailed description of your concerns and preferably what you see not being addressed as part of the resolution. RESOLUTION ---------- In [1] you ask whether the WG has considered the various cache-control directives and in particular "no-transform" and how that applies to SOAP. The WG discussed the issue and came to the following conclusion: Any HTTP implementation should certainly take advantage of the features provided by HTTP [3]. However, there is nothing particularly special about how the various cache-control directives apply to SOAP - they are defined in an entirely orthogonal manner and so the WG didn't see a reason for why the binding should say. Thank you, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com [0] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues#x204 [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Apr/0173.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/ [3] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txtReceived on Wednesday, 1 May 2002 15:06:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:27 GMT