Re: Issue 189: closed

Addendum to my original closure message[1] for issue 189.

The earlier message[1] described only one aspect of the resolution for issue 189, as
pointed out by Henrik[2]. A second aspect should have been described, and is included
below.

<resolution part="2">
While all SOAP message examples in this document are shown using XML 1.0[8] this is
not a requirement of SOAP (see 5 SOAP Protocol Binding Framework).
</resolution>

Jean-Jacques.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Mar/0029.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Mar/0039.html

> Noah,
>
> You raised an issue about what XML version number SOAP should
> specify [1]. The WG will close this issue with the following
> resolution:
>
> <resolution>
> Enchance the description of the Envelope encoding to include
> discussion stating that the values of the [version], [character
> encoding scheme] and [standalone] infoset properties are
> unimportant as far as SOAP is concerned.
> </resolution>
>
> Please respond to this message, cc'eing xmlp-comments, if you
> think this is an unacceptable resolution.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jean-Jacques.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x189
>
>   -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>    * Next message: Martin Gudgin: "Issue 167 closed: Support for XML Schema Types"
>    * Previous message: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen: "Issue #41 closed"
>    * Next in thread: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com: "Re: Issue 189: closed"
>    * Reply: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com: "Re: Issue 189: closed"
>    * Reply: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen: "RE: Issue 189: closed"
>    * Reply: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com: "RE: Issue 189: closed"
>    * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>    * Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
>    * Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2002 10:40:26 UTC