Re: XP Requirements from the P3P WG

Thanks!

Lorrie Cranor wrote:

> Chris,
> 
> The P3P Specification Workiing group agrees that the
> requirements we submitted have been met in the 
> SOAP1.2 draft specification. We appreciate your taking
> P3P and privacy considerations into account when drafting this 
> specification.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Lorrie Cranor
> P3P Specification Working Group Chair
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Christopher Ferris" <chris.ferris@sun.com>
> To: <w3c-p3p-specification@w3.org>; <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:35 PM
> Subject: XP Requirements from the P3P WG
> 
> 
> 
>>P3P WG,
>>
>>The XML Protocol WG believes that the requirements[1] submitted by
>>the P3P WG have been met in the SOAP1.2 draft specification(s)[2,3]
>>and that the SOAP1.2 protocol provides an effective mechanism for
>>association of a P3P privacy policywith a SOAP message (SOAP header
>>block(s)).
>>
>>We would appreciate your review of the recently published draft
>>specification(s) in light of your requirements to confirm our
>>belief that your stated requirements are met in SOAP1.2.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Chris
>>
>>[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xmlp-reqs-20010319/#N1573
>>[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/
>>[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 

Received on Monday, 28 January 2002 13:40:02 UTC