W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > August 2002

Re: issue 227

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:16:48 +0200
Message-ID: <3D635A80.EF772E9A@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Williams Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Mark A. Jones" <jones@research.att.com>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, jacek@systinet.com, marc.hadley@sun.com, xmlp-comments@w3.org

This brings the question: the resolution appears clearer now than it did
originally, but isn't this a consequence of this (long) discussion, and
shouldn't the resolution text itself be clarified, so that others can clearly
understand what was meant?


"Williams, Stuart" wrote:

> I think that this has been discussed and clarified to let the matter rest as
> resolved by the WG.
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 05:17:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:59 UTC