Mike, at the F2F, the XMLP discussed issue 330 [1] you raised [2]. After discussion, the WG has decided to close this issue without changes in the specification. The WG follows the remarks made by Noah Mendelson in [3] section #2. In addition, your issue was discussed by the WG earlier named the "mustHappen" attribute. We desided to add no such attribute, because the same semantic could be embodied by adding SOAP header blocks. The mustUnderstand feature was carefully designed to support such requirements. If you feel that this does not adequately address the issue that you raised, please contact the WG ASAP. Volker Wiechers, SAP [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues#x329 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Jul/0086.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Jul/0087.htmlReceived on Thursday, 1 August 2002 11:21:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:27 GMT