W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > October 2001

Closing issue 8

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:04:22 -0800
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D055AB15F@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>

The WG has decided to close issue 8 with the resolution stated below.

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 18:37
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
Cc: David Fallside; xml-dist-app@w3.org
Subject: Re: Proposal for closing issue 8




Right. As I recall, I had made some general comments about the
processing model, etc. pretty early on, which were logged as an issue;
since, I believe that all of the points have been taken on by separate
issues.

I'd propose we call it redundant in light of later issues.


On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:03:10PM -0800, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> 
> Mark can comment further but the items being discussed including 
> processing ordering, optional vs. mandatory, and faults have been 
> addressed by other issues such as #65, #100, and #106. The issue of 
> HTTP status codes is addressed by #12.
> 
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
> 
> >What exactly is the item(s) of concern expressed in issue #8,
> >and what is the proposal to resolve it?
> 
> >[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues#x8

-- 
Mark Nottingham
http://www.mnot.net/
 
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2001 17:05:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:26 GMT