Miles Sabin wrote: > But why should the URI-to-resouce binding be any more constant > than the resource-to-entity body relationship? What is the reason for flexibility? > The President isn't always the same person, and whichever > person it happens to be this week isn't always the same bunch > of atoms. Just so. When you have a bill to be signed, you want to access the resource named "urn:us-gov:the-president", to wit, the President. Whichever (entity) body you get, currently Mr. Clinton, will be able to do what you want. If you want Clinton himself, you need a different resource with a different URI, which will be bound to the same (entity) body at the moment. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet HeinReceived on Thursday, 7 September 2000 15:11:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:25 GMT