RE: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-daigle-uri-std-00.txt

At 06:05 PM 9/7/00 +0100, Miles Sabin wrote:
>But why should the URI-to-resouce binding be any more constant
>than the resource-to-entity body relationship?

Because that's how RFC 2396 defines it to be.

What I'd like to know is what official/definitive document says whether the 
URI:resource relationship is 1:1 or N:1.   Any offers?

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)

Received on Thursday, 7 September 2000 13:31:21 UTC