W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > June 2000

Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump andissues check)

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:05:04 -0400
Message-ID: <3953C2F0.817C4DCC@reutershealth.com>
To: keshlam@us.ibm.com, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
keshlam@us.ibm.com wrote:
> >The Infoset WD says that documents that aren't NS-compliant don't have
> infosets.
> Thank you, Sir John of Cowan. So if we declare that relative NS
> declarations are forbidden by the Namespace spec, that introduces no new
> special cases or conflicts.

Right.  The latest (internal) draft of the Infoset WD has no problem as
written with "forbid" or "literal", and simply needs a new property for
namespace information items if "absolute" is chosen, namely "resolved URI".


Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Friday, 23 June 2000 16:05:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:44 UTC