W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > June 2000

Re: namespace usage as assertions

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 15:56:27 -0400
Message-ID: <39511DEB.D8CBE02F@reutershealth.com>
To: "Eve L. Maler" <Eve.Maler@east.sun.com>
CC: xml-uri@w3.org
"Eve L. Maler" wrote:
 
> If you're serious about "points to," then despite your urgings when we did
> the original Namespaces work, we should not have used URIs for namespace
> names because pointing to something was "not a goal."

*sigh*

A URI *identifies* a resource.  A resource may be instantiated by zero, one, or
many entity bodies.  Thus the URI http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/scritchifschisted
identifies a resource with zero entity bodies: attempts to fetch the entity
body will fail.  (You cannot fetch a resource, because resources are abstractions;
you can only fetch the corresponding entity bodies).

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2000 15:56:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:25 GMT