W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > June 2000

(no subject)

From: <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 23:12:58 -0400
To: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>
cc: "\"Clark C. Evans\"" <cce@clarkevans.com>, xml-uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <852568FC.00480B2B.00@D51MTA03.pok.ibm.com>
> On the contrary, you can indeed acertain that
>two URIs given identify the same resource.
>What you cannot do is acertain that they don't.

Was there a clear defense of the assertion that this weak inequality was a
reasonable characteristic for namespace identities, and thus that using
URIs for this purpose really made sense in the first place?

I think there _is_ an expectation that we can clearly distinguish namespace
inequality as well as equality. Consider XSLT processing; elements
belonging to XSLT's namespace are commands, those which don't are
considered literal content. It feels rather strange to be considering
recasting this as "those we are/aren't sure of".

______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Received on Monday, 12 June 2000 09:07:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:25 GMT