W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > June 2000

Re: A proposed solution

From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 20:34:08 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <m130r1E-000OdCC@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
To: masinter@attlabs.att.com
CC: xml-uri@w3.org

> Considering RFC 2557 as a precedent, would it be feasible       
> to define a separate 'base' to be used for xmlns attributes  
> in XML documents?    

well that's the "fixed-base" option which John Cowan and I passed
variations of on this list a day or so ago. It didn't generate
much comment except from Tim Berners-Lee who said it was against the
uri spec.


TBL> The URI spec specifies that a relative URI is relative to the URI
TBL> of the containing document.  That's what it means.

me> XML documents may spread over several entities with different base URI.
me> XML base extends that concept further and means that the base URI
me> may change within a single file. So the language in the RFC probably
me> needs to be changed or creatively interpreted in any case.

David
Received on Saturday, 10 June 2000 15:29:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:25 GMT