W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > June 2000

Re: Re Deprecate/Undefined (was Request for status dump and issues check)

From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 17:36:04 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <m1305Ho-000OdCC@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
To: keshlam@us.ibm.com
CC: xml-uri@w3.org

> both immediately and with an eye toward possible reconsideration
> of absolutize in the XML 2.0 timeframe.

One strong argument for not making the behaviour undefined is that it
leaves the door open to restart the discussion later. I think
"undefined" is the worst possible outcome (after "absolute", which would
be an unmitigated disaster)

David
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2000 12:44:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:24 GMT