- From: Clark C. Evans <cce@clarkevans.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:40:50 -0400 (EDT)
- To: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
- cc: cowan@locke.ccil.org, xml-uri@w3.org
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, David Carlisle wrote: > > 2) As an interpretation rule, all relative URI references are to be > > absolutized relative to the fixed base URI > > "http://www.w3.org/2000/Namespaces/base/" > > Thinking about this a bit more, it would be better if a > different protocol or hostname part could be used I'd prefer a new protocol, one that does not imply that the namespace is a hypertext resource or mail box resource, etc. > "http://relativenamespacenames.w3.org/2000/Namespaces/base/" xmlns:org.w3c.relns > Using the one you suggested (or the one I suggested earlier) would > mean that xmlns="../../../1998/Math/MathML" would be a valid > declaration of MathML, which isn't very nice. Given "http://www.w3c.org/2000/Namespaces/base", what would happen if my relative namespace is... "../../../../pop_empty_stack" Clark
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2000 11:35:47 UTC