Re: rel:foo for those who can't do without 'relative' URIs

>with this in place, is there *any* reason (besides the 3 legacy documents
>:-) not to ban relative URI references as namespace names?

I think that's always been the only serious objection to banning them.

If the folks who felt they couldn't live without relative syntax (for fear
of breaking legacy documents) are willing to take this solution, GO FOR IT.
I've lost track of whether that's still a concern or not.

______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research