Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace

John Aldridge wrote:

> Are you saying that
>
>     <?xml version="1.0" ?>
>     <jingle xmlns="mailto:john.aldridge@informatix.co.uk" />
>
> is not a well-formed XML-with-namespaces document?
> Or that, although well-formed, it's unprocessable?

It's neither ill-formed nor unprocessable.  But it's unexpected -- in the
sense that the namespace spec and the W3-specified namespace names give not
the slightest hint that such variants of URI were ever contemplated.

Paul Abrahams

Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2000 12:27:39 UTC