W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > June 2000

Re: Common Sense! Was: Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace

From: Clark C. Evans <cce@clarkevans.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 15:29:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
cc: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, xml-uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006041519390.19556-100000@clarkevans.com>
On Sun, 4 Jun 100, John Cowan wrote:
> I agree that the relationship is one-one (and even onto), but I deny
> that it amounts to identity.  Confounding the namespace with the document
> that describes it is a map-territory error.

Right on.   We are identifying a namespace resource!  We are
not identifying a hypertext resources which describes a 
given namespace -- this is a seperate problem entirely.

It is unforunate that the current spec allows this; 
I now agree that the xmlns attribval *should* be a URI,
(Tim has convinced me of this much)... However, I think
it should not be any old URI from any old scheme.  Fellas,
we need a URI scheme specifically for namespaces. 
Let's deprechiate duck quacking.


Received on Sunday, 4 June 2000 15:24:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:43 UTC