W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > June 2000

Re: The 'resource' identified by a namespace name URI should be the namespace

From: Clark C. Evans <cce@clarkevans.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 20:06:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: michaelm@netsol.com
cc: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006012000360.8079-100000@clarkevans.com>
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Michael Mealling wrote:
> In other words, an injective quality is really irrelevant....

The injective function is only relevant if:

  * one wishes to compare namespaces *as* resources
  * one does not which to resove the resource from the URI

If you wish to compare resources based upon URIs, an
injective (1-1, unique, etc.) function is needed from 
the URI space into the resource space. 

In the case that we stick with the current specification's
definition of the namespace *as* the URI string, and not 
as a resource it refers to; then the function is not 
required, and hence, the injective debate is moot.

Clark
Received on Thursday, 1 June 2000 20:01:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:24 GMT