Re: Moving on (was Re: URIs quack like a duck)

> Sounds fine to me. It just means that I'll wait for 2.0 before I
> implement anything using XML Namespaces. I don't mean that to be facetious.
> Its just that, since I assumed (which was my fault) that namespace names
> were URIs in all respects, I now consider this version to be broken for
> my purposes...

As I suspected, you haven't been using namespaces at all.
Which is why you can be so casual about scrapping two years worth of
XML development.

What _are_ the purposes for which you want to use XML namespaces?

David

Received on Thursday, 1 June 2000 05:45:12 UTC