hello, you describe the insufficiency of the traditional namespace with an example in appendix A.1. you state further that "In this example, there are three occurrences of the name title within markup, and the name alone clearly provides insufficient information to allow correct processing by a software module." however, the name title is part a unique path and most software modules can determine the correct title from a path. e.g. /section/title/, /signing/author/title, etc. isn't there an inherent namespace derived from the structure of the document. can you give me a better example that justifies the additional complexity of namespaces. the benefit of XML is simplicity which seems to be disappearing under the auspices of the w3. -chuck kungReceived on Tuesday, 8 December 1998 22:34:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:17 GMT