W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-names-editor@w3.org > June 2006

Re: [xml-names] editorial

From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:16:49 +0100 (BST)
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, xml-names-editor@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060615231649.65DCB6E2737@macintosh.inf.ed.ac.uk>


> It also says "Element names MUST NOT have the prefix xmlns." Here MUST NOT  
> is not marked up like the other RFC2119 terms, was that intentional?

No, another mistake.

-- Richard

Received on Thursday, 15 June 2006 23:17:04 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Tobin: "Re: [xml-names] empty string namespace name"
Previous message: Richard Tobin: "Re: XML declarations say "1.1" in the 1.0 spec"
In reply to: Anne van Kesteren: "[xml-names] editorial"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 30 April 2009 12:12:57 GMT