W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-names-editor@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 07:40:22 +0900
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20021204073525.04f017c8@localhost>
To: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
Cc: xml-names-editor@w3.org

Hello Richard,

Many thanks for your response and the followups.
The I18N WG Core Task Force has discussed your response today.
It has given myself the following action:

Action Martin: To confirm Misha's comments as official WG/TF comments.
                To check section 9 and add comments if necessary
                (in particular, there may be no need for a syntax definition)
                'character' may be well defined, but not
                'character-by-character identity'

I'm contacting you today because it was my understanding from what
Francois Yergeau said today at our teleconference that the CR would
be finalized by your WG tomorrow, and that a link to the draft
as it currently stands would be in the mail. However, from your
mail below, I gather that you need our response by Dec 9th.
Can you confirm this, and give me a link to your current editing
version, so that I can check section 9?

Regards,    Martin.

At 18:32 02/11/28 +0000, Richard Tobin wrote:

>This is a formal response from the XML Core WG to your comments on the
>Namespaces in XML 1.1 last call working draft.
>
>If we haven't heard from you by the end of Monday December 9th, we
>will assume for the purposes of our planned CR request that you have
>no objection to our resolution.
>
>Commenter email address: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org
>
> >Subject: Namespaces 1.1 Last Call -- I18N WG comments
>
> >Section "1 Motivation and Summary"
> >----------------------------------
> >[comments on IRI identity]
>
>Summary: accepted
>
>We will add an appendix with plenty of examples to cover the possible
>gotchas you list.
>
> > Section "2 Declaring Namespaces"
> > --------------------------------
> >
> > Text:
> >
> >    Though they are not themselves reserved, it is inadvisable to use
> >    prefixed names whose LocalPart begins with the letters x, m, l, as
> >    these names would be reserved if used without a prefix.
> >
> > Comments:
> >
> >    Please add "in any case combination".
>
>Summary: accepted
>
> > Section "7 Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs)"
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Comments:
> >
> >    Please align this section with the XML specification, 2nd edition, as
> >    corrected by errata E26:
> >[...]
> >  We think there are other, more serious, problems with this section,
> >  which we'll describe in a separate mail.
>
>We're not sure what aligning it would amount to; presumably it would be
>more appropriate to align XML 1.x system identifiers with the IRI spec
>when it comes out.
>
>As to the more serious problems, we have re-written the section as
>described in our earlier message:
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-i18n-ig/2002Nov/0009.html
>
>-- Richard Tobin, Namespaces 1.1 editor
Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 17:40:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:43 GMT