- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 17:07:32 -0500
- To: Shiho MORIAI <shiho@sucaba.isl.ntt.co.jp>
- Cc: Shiho MORIAI <shiho@sucaba.isl.ntt.co.jp>, Donald Eastlake <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, xml-encryption@w3.org, shiho@sucaba.isl.ntt.co.jp
The namespace the W3C allocated was: http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmldsig-more That should be reflected in the forthcoming draft. On Tuesday 29 October 2002 08:57 am, Shiho MORIAI wrote: > Donald, Joseph, and XML Encryption WG, > > Thank you for your advise. As Donald proposed, I'll define the > identifiers and profile for Camellia and ask him to include them in > his internet-draft, which will be updated this week. > > I have a comment on the additional XML Security URIs. > > All the algorithm URIs in the current (expired) draft > <draft-eastlake-xmldsig-uri-02.txt> are of the form > http://www.w3.org/...../xmldsig-more#algorithm. > > For example, the identifier for ARCFOUR is defined in the above draft > as follows: > http://www.w3.org/...../xmldsig-more#arcfour, > ^^^^^^^ > although the EncryptionMethod element is specified in the XML > Encryption, not the XML Digital Signature. > > Is it possible to define URIs for encryption algorithms of the form: > http://www.w3.org/...../xmlenc-more#algorithm? > ^^^^^^ > Best regards, > Shiho -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2002 17:07:36 UTC