W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > March 2002

Re: More inter samples

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:46:17 -0500
Message-Id: <200203141846.NAA22454@tux.w3.org>
To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
On Thursday 14 March 2002 13:16, merlin wrote:
> I would change the parenthesis to:
>
>   (Including the plaintext decryption key, whether a private key or
>   a secret key, is obviously NOT RECOMMENDED.)

Ok.

> X/Y/Z can't really be expressed for a general environment. It might be
> possible to say that performance should be, broadly speaking, linear in
> document size (taking into consideration cache and memory constraints),
> and within a reasonable constant of performing the relevant operation
> (e.g., XML parsing) on the plaintext data.

Yes... well I suppose I'll leave it there and implementors can be abstract, 
"Yes, I find the specification capable of being use to create an 
implementation with satisfactory performance..." But any more specificity I 
can get, I welcome.
-- 

Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 13:46:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:20 GMT