W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > January 2002

Re: Support for xml:lang and xml:space (xml:base?) in EncryptedType?

From: Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 18:20:09 -0500
Message-ID: <001a01c1a209$01711c80$6400a8c0@DJQC7111>
To: <xml-encryption@w3.org>
I'd like to hear arguments why the Brian LaMacchia solution #3
(see
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002JanMar/0027.html"
and
"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002JanMar/0054.html")
would NOT be sufficient for encryption properties as well.

Ed

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Reagle" <reagle@w3.org>
To: <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Cc: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 3:23 PM
Subject: Support for xml:lang and xml:space (xml:base?) in EncryptedType?


>
> On the xmldsig list Rich suggested [1]  permitting xml:space for
> ds:SignatureProperties and ds:Object. While it's too late to effect much
of
> anything in xmldsig, that's not quite the case here if we still have a lot
> of folks that think something is a good idea.
>
> So while we have the chance, does anyone want this for
> EncryptionProperties? For EncryptedData itself?
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002JanMar/0007.html
>
> --
>
> Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
> W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
> IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
> W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
>
Received on Sunday, 20 January 2002 18:20:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:20 GMT