- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:22:14 -0400
- To: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
- Cc: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>
On Monday 29 April 2002 09:03, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote: > Yes, we should make it clear, either in the text or in our references > section, that we are using a snapshot. If they haven't issued as RFCs > we should just reference these draft as works in progress but we can > give authors, title, and date if we want. Ok, I make a few tweaks to show we are "adopting" the text (so our text is normative for our spec) and state "(These specifications are still works in progress so we include those parts of their present specification within this document where necessary.)"
Received on Monday, 29 April 2002 11:22:16 UTC