W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > April 2002

Re: What do we do with our CMS References?

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 11:22:14 -0400
To: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Cc: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20020429152214.1BE3D972@policy.w3.org>
On Monday 29 April 2002 09:03, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote:
> Yes, we should make it clear, either in the text or in our references
> section, that we are using a snapshot. If they haven't issued as RFCs
> we should just reference these draft as works in progress but we can
> give authors, title, and date if we want.

Ok, I make a few tweaks to show we are "adopting" the text (so our text is 
normative for our spec) and state "(These specifications are still works in 
progress so we include those parts of their present specification within 
this document where necessary.)"
Received on Monday, 29 April 2002 11:22:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:21 GMT