W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > April 2002

Re: FW: Re: rsa/oaep

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:16:26 -0400
Message-Id: <200204252016.QAA11635@tux.w3.org>
To: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, xml-encryption@w3.org
On Thursday 25 April 2002 00:40, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote:
> Seems to me that we should stick with the current implemented URI for
> the currently implemented algorithm with the current parameters.

This sounds like the best bet to me. What we have does work, and it might 
not be the best format for future parameters but that bridge can be crossed 
when encountered. (A new identifier/namespace and all the parameters 
desired can be proposed.) So I'm going to stick with the text I have now in 
[1] and consider the issue closed unless someone wants to document their 
dissent.

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-core/Overview.html#sec-RSA-OAEP
 $Revision: 1.184 $ on $Date: 2002/04/17 13:17:07 $ GMT
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 16:16:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:21 GMT