- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:16:26 -0400
- To: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, xml-encryption@w3.org
On Thursday 25 April 2002 00:40, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote: > Seems to me that we should stick with the current implemented URI for > the currently implemented algorithm with the current parameters. This sounds like the best bet to me. What we have does work, and it might not be the best format for future parameters but that bridge can be crossed when encountered. (A new identifier/namespace and all the parameters desired can be proposed.) So I'm going to stick with the text I have now in [1] and consider the issue closed unless someone wants to document their dissent. [1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xmlenc-core/Overview.html#sec-RSA-OAEP $Revision: 1.184 $ on $Date: 2002/04/17 13:17:07 $ GMT
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 16:16:28 UTC