W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > September 2001

Minutes of 010917-tele

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:22:59 -0400
To: xenc <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20010917172300.7D59F8746D@policy.w3.org>
  Chair: Joseph Reagle
  Note Taker: Joseph Reagle [3]ascii]


     * Joseph Reagle, W3C
     * Blair Dillaway, Microsoft
     * Katherine Betz, IBM
     * Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola
     * Ed Simon, XMLsec
     * Frederick Hirsch, Zolera
     * (regrets) Amir Herzberg, NewGenPay
     * John Messing, Law on Line


     * Takeshi sent an update to the Signature Decryption Transform
       (informed by implementation experience) that I'll post shortly.

Status of documents

     * We'd like to go to last call, need to finish up a few of these

Reviewing [4]Previous Items

   From [5]previous minutes minutes.
    1. Eastlake: add real life examples in section 5.5 to illustrate.
       Pending: take some time to resolve.
    2. Action Hughes: ([6] XML Encryption Processing Model) Will
       investigate and send an email on Xerces implementation using XNI,
       or DOM when processing Element or Element Content.
    3. Action Eastlake:Tweak [7]KeyAgreement for keysize and (pseudo
       random number generation.
       Expect to complete within a few days.
       Action Eastlake: make the tweaks to (section 5.4) Key Transport
       such that [8]public key encryption is not limited to key
       transport, but can be used to encrypt actual data though it is
       Expect to complete within a few days.
    4. Action Reagle: [9]Add text on the creation of nonce and integrity
       in the processing rules.
       Will complete when last issue is resolved.

      [5] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Minutes/010820-tele.html




     * [10]Scenario for Plaintext Integrity
       Reagle demonstrated how one might satisfy Herzerg's requirements
       using XML-DSIG, how do people feel?
       Simon: no strong direction.
       Don: leaning towards Amir's proposal as presently specified.
       Frederick: no strong feeling.
       Katherine: no position.
       Reagle: Ok, I'll respond to Amir's latest questions on the list
       and post a more formal poll, but it looks like we are not leaning
       one way or the other very strongly, and expect the present spec to
       carry the day if that continues to be the case.
     * Reagle: Were behind our milestones. Action Reagle: Update charter.



     * Next call on October 1, 2001.
Received on Monday, 17 September 2001 13:23:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:02 UTC