W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > November 2001

Decryption Transform comments

From: Frederick Hirsch <hirsch@zolera.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 12:09:39 -0500
To: <reagle@w3.org>
Cc: <xml-encryption@w3.org>
Message-ID: <HNEILHLKDJAILJJBNELPOEGNCGAA.hirsch@zolera.com>
I've attached an edited version of the Decryption Transform draft, with some
minor wording and clarification changes marked in green using a .change
style.

Shouldn't the URI attribute of the Except element be required? The schema
says it is optional.

I also find the function name noDecryptNodes confusing and sugggest an
alternative: decryptIncludedNodes

I also have a question regarding transform generation. Should the document
be canonicalized before creating the Decryption Transform, as well as after?

---
Frederick Hirsch
Zolera Systems, http://www.zolera.com/
Information Integrity, XML Security




Received on Thursday, 1 November 2001 12:10:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:19 GMT