At 02:12 6/6/2001, Takeshi Imamura wrote: >I agree with you that we should define our Transforms element to clarify >its behavior, especially what is the input to the first Transform and what >the output from the last Transform is passed to. Ok, please look at: http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/11-proposal.html#sec-CipherData $Revision: 1.11 $ on $Date: 2001/06/06 19:16:01 $ Do you also believe we need to be more specific about node/octet translations between those types of transforms, or can we just rely upon [XMLDSIG]} -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 15:21:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:19 GMT