W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > June 2001

Re: CipherData rationale

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 15:18:32 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010606151641.00b8b5b8@localhost>
To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Cc: "Frederick J. Hirsch" <hirsch@zolera.com>, <xml-encryption@w3.org>
At 02:12 6/6/2001, Takeshi Imamura wrote:
>I agree with you that we should define our Transforms element to clarify
>its behavior, especially what is the input to the first Transform and what
>the output from the last Transform is passed to.

Ok, please look at:
         http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/11-proposal.html#sec-CipherData
         $Revision: 1.11 $ on $Date: 2001/06/06 19:16:01 $

Do you also believe we need to be more specific about node/octet 
translations between those types of transforms, or can we just rely upon 
[XMLDSIG]}


--
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 15:21:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:19 GMT