[Resulting document http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/05/11-proposal.html#sec-Processing-XML $Revision: 1.11 $ on $Date: 2001/06/06 19:16:01 $ ] For interoperability purposes, the following types MUST be implemented. Element 'http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#Element' ... Content 'http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#Content' ... MediaType ' http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/*/*' A user specified media type (e.g., text/xml). All such types are implemented as simple octet encryption. At 02:12 6/6/2001, Takeshi Imamura wrote: > >>4. In 4.3, I'm not sure, but if the media type, "text/xml", for an XML > >>document is specified to implement, its processing rules should be also > >>specified. > > > >What would be necessary beyond what is necessary for any other octet > >sequence? > >This is exactly what I want to ask. I also think that nothing is necessary >beyond what is necessary for an octet sequence, and so I do not see the >reason for specifying that a media type "text/xml" MUST be implemented. If >a special processing is not necessary, specifying the media type does not >make sense for me... -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2001 15:21:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:19 GMT