W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > September 2000

RE: Encrypted Node URI and NodeType

From: Ed Simon <ed.simon@entrust.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 17:47:18 -0400
Message-ID: <3120721CA75DD411B8340090273D20B10C1BB9@sottmxs06.entrust.com>
To: Public XML Encryption List <xml-encryption@w3.org>
I think re-using XSet does have some merit but the EncryptedNode
(alias EncryptedData) may also contain data that was not originally
XML (eg. an encrypted, base64ed GIF) and so the value of the Type
attribute could not be limited to XSet-defined representations.

Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. [mailto:reagle@w3.org]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 4:32 PM
To: Public XML Encryption List
Subject: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Encrypted Node URI and NodeType


For those interested in issues related to representing XMl structure 
explicitly (if parts of them come to be encrypted), you might be interested 
in XSet.

Forwarded Text ----
>From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
>Thanks Joseph. Some more references on this topic are at
>http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200008/msg00412.html (XSet)
>http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200008/msg00239.html
>
>XML in RDF in XML via XSLT: an infoset implementation (Dan Connolly)
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Aug/0061.html
>
>There's also a brief XMLhack.com piece on XSet etc at
>http://www.xmlhack.com/read.php?item=696
>
>Dan
End Forwarded Text ----

_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 11 September 2000 19:41:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:17 GMT