W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: [xml-dev] Errata E57

From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:08:32 -0500
Message-Id: <p06002000bbcede136b01@[192.168.254.4]>
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Cc: xml-editor@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org

At 8:40 AM -0500 11/5/03, John Cowan wrote:


>3) (current)  Post errata to a public page; when there are enough,
>issue a Proposed Edited Recommendation for public comment.  After the
>comment period, change what needs changing in the errata list and
>issue a new edition of the Recommendation.
>


So is the current process that errata don't count until a new edition 
of the recommendation has been issued? That does not seem clear from 
the various pages. I don't see anything listed as "proposed errata" 
or "possible errata", just errata. In fact, the XML 1.0 errata page 
classifies everything on the page as "Known Errors". If it was your 
intention that these be considered as tentative, the language of the 
page does not reflect that.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   elharo@metalab.unc.edu
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:46 UTC