W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: [xml-dev] version numbers and infosets

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 12:43:33 +0100
Message-Id: <200207241143.MAA02269@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: jcowan@reutershealth.com
CC: xml-dev@lists.xml.org, xml-editor@w3.org

> but extended-ASCII files won't
> work that way: plaintext expects NEL (#x85).

If the file is in extended-ibm-ascii then stick
encoding="extended-ibm-ascii" in the xml declaration and the job is
It only works on parsers that know that encoding but compared to the
cost to everyone of changing the white space rules in XML this is
always going to be preferable.

Even if you do bring out a 1.1 that has NEL in white space anyone who
cares about portability would be better advised to use 1.0 and such an
encoding declaration rather than use 1.1.

I think you should do 1.1 to allow unicode 3+ characters in names, but
changing the white space rules is just gratuitous incompatibility
that helps no one, not even users of NEL.


This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2002 07:44:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:41 UTC