W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: xml 1.0 and unicode ideograph ext a and ext b

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 21:02:34 +0900
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20020405105348.0262a008@localhost>
To: xml-editor@w3.org, ftang@netscape.com (Yung-Fong Tang), unicode@unicode.org, Nisheeth Ranjan <nisheeth@netscape.com>, momoi@netscape.com
Hello Yung-Fong,

First, please send potential error reports to xml-editor@w3.org
as indicated in the spec. Second, as somebody else has already
said, the XML Core WG is working on extending the repertoire of
XML Names in XML Blueberry / XML 1.1.

If you have any specific comments, I suggest you send them to
the W3C I18N IG for discussion.

Regards,   Martin.

At 14:20 02/04/03 -0800, Yung-Fong Tang wrote:
>dear XML editors:
>
>When our QA engineers try to verify our XML support with characters from 
>Unicode Ideograph Ext A and Ext B block , we found the following issue
>http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134963
>
>basically, according to the XML 1.0 2nd edition speciifcation, only 
>BaseChar and Ideograph could be used as Letter, but none of the characters 
>from Unicode Ideograph Ext A block and Unicode Ideograph Ext B block are 
>listed as Ideograph. Therefore, xml which use use characters from these 
>two block for element name are consider not well-formed now.
>
>Any plan to change the xml specification to follow the newly updated 
>Unicode 3.2 Standard ?
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 6 April 2002 07:02:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:31 GMT