W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > April to June 2000

RE: errata list errata

From: (wrong string) çois Yergeau <yergeau@alis.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 10:46:40 -0400
To: <schererm@us.ibm.com>, <xml-editor@w3.org>
Cc: <mpogue@us.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <001001bfcfc6$06e8af50$94ccfdcf@fyergeau2.intra.alis.com>
Markus Scherer wrote:
> often times, when one erratum obsoletes another one, the
> older one gets an
> "Obsoleted by xyz". At least two of those seem to be missing:
> E37: Obsoleted by E67
> E1: Obsoleted by E44

Thanks, that's fixed.

> This really helps navigating the errata.

That's the point!

> Also, E44 should have similar font settings as the part of
> Annex F that it
> replaces: Only the byte sequences should be monospaced, the
> explanatory
> text should be in the default style (proportional).

Yes, but see below.

> Is there any plan for a consolidated XML TR that has all of the errata
> merged into it? When will this happen?

It's very clear that a revised spec is needed, so much so that an effort is
underway to do just that.  ETA is a few weeks, where "few" is,
unfortunately, a bit vague.

The revised spec will have correct formatting of Appendix F.

Regards,

--
François Yergeau
Received on Tuesday, 6 June 2000 10:51:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:30 GMT