W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-editor@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Possible changes for XML 2nd Edition

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 18:29:50 -0400
Message-ID: <392C57DE.5D3E0617@reutershealth.com>
To: "Liam R. E. Quin" <liamquin@interlog.com>
CC: xml-editor@w3.org, "xml-dev@xml.org" <xml-dev@xml.org>
"Liam R. E. Quin" wrote:

> This seems to me to be sensible.
> It does mean that the parser has to check the encoding, though.

It has to anyway.
> What about XPointer?  #id(simon)
> You have to allow fragment ids, and to make them optional, I think.

They are definitely allowed.  The question is, if one is present, is
a parser allowed to ignore it?


Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2000 18:30:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:39 UTC