- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:51:14 -0800
- To: "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Ok, nice; I guess I should have looked at your proposal before sending that. 8-) I had only looked at DaveO's proposal. I have one comment, and some editorial patches for your proposal which I'll send in a separate message. Mark. On 1/11/06, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote: > I think the redraft I posted at [1] is consistent with the assumptions and > conclusions in your note. Specifically, the inboundMessage and > outputBoundMessage properties continue to consistent of the entire SOAP > level message, including things like the WebMethod when appropriate. All > that's changed is that (a) the request/response MEP makes clear that the > response messages for that MEP need not contain a SOAP envelope and (b) > the HTTP binding makes clear that the correct embodiment of an otherwise > successful "no envelope" response is an status code of 202. > > Noah > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2006Jan/0050.html > > -------------------------------------- > Noah Mendelsohn > IBM Corporation > One Rogers Street > Cambridge, MA 02142 > 1-617-693-4036 > -------------------------------------- > > > > > -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 17:51:19 UTC