W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2005

Re: Response envelope optional vs. response optional

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:09:31 -0500
Message-ID: <c70bc85d0512210709y26a2da4cia97bba78a8b3a26@mail.gmail.com>
To: "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org

On 12/21/05, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> I would disagree very strongly with talking about the subsequent delivery
> of the SOAP Response in the cases where a 202/204 was returned.  My view
> is that, with this pattern, there is no obligation to do anything further
> at all after the 202/204, at least not at the SOAP level.

+1!!

Mark.
--
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.       http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2005 15:10:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:20 GMT