On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 15:57:20 -0700 Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> wrote: > I also have my doubts about the rationale for focusing on the endpoint > declaration of the provider agent. For instance, what does that endpoint > mean in the case of an Out-only pattern? Wouldn't it be more useful to > have the endpoint declaration of the "requester" agent instead? Only if you're locked into thinking about HTTP and client/server models. In a pub/sub world, an out-only pattern (or any out-initial pattern) is a nice fit, and we expect to see these widely used. This is because, in pub/sub, the service is talking, not listening; publishing, not serving. The other nodes interacting with the service are not requesters/clients, but listeners/subscribers. > I don't see why it should be that way and why we should assume that the > provider agent's behavior is better known than the requester agent's > behavior. Because the WSDL is always from the point of view of the service. This is ground we have gone over multiple times. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. alewis@tibco.comReceived on Monday, 14 June 2004 10:32:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:18 GMT