W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2004

Re: Language for resolving issue 440

From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:39:18 -0800
To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-id: <6AE6D029-47BC-11D8-93E6-000A95BC8D92@sun.com>

I don't recall - do we already have text that captures the other part 
of the resolution, namely that MTOM doesn't preclude additional parts 
in the package not reference via miffy:Include ?


On Jan 14, 2004, at 10:29 PM, Martin Gudgin wrote:

> At the FTF in San Francisco, Marc Hadley and I took an action to 
> propose
> wording for the agreed resolution of issue 440. I note that Section
> 4.3.1 of the latest editors draft contains the following language:
> Each optimized Node MUST generate exactly one extracted binary part in
> the resulting package. I.e., extracted binary parts MUST NOT be
> referenced with more than one miffy:Include in the SOAP message part.
> This language seems to be along the right lines, although I'm not sure
> it's entirely appropriate to the section it's in ( which is talking
> about serialization, whereas the phrasing above seems to be somewhat
> related to deserialization ). Anyhow, I'll propose alternative wording
> by the Monday deadline if I think it's critical given our pub schedule.
> GUdge
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Web Products, Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2004 19:39:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:25 UTC